Monday, April 15, 2024

Trump's Billionaire 2017 Tax Cut Plan: Comes From His New Book "The Sky Has No Limit for You"

Makes Quid Pro Quo promise he says he’ll keep

The headline in this MSNBC article (with a 5-minute video seen below) showing Trump’s quid pro quo and nastiness of some Republican senators on the topic of child tax credits to help low-income families now in this tax season time with this story headline:

“Senate Republicans’ breathtaking cruelty is hidden in your tax returns”

Watch this “Morning Joe” MSNBC video to get an accurate view of the issue:

                           Video Click Here

Read and weep and but, not for childless GOP families, or I suppose not for low income GOP families at or below the poverty levels and with children in “Red” states, um?

As the article points out, DEMS and President Biden made child poverty reach the lowest levels ever in the nation’s history.

But, also noted in the story, the GOP wants it back for political reasons (based on a few quotes in the article that are sickening).

As an off-shoot to the article above, it must be noted that Trump recently went a FL billionaire’s fundraiser and while there in his speech he promised the other billionaires there that he would keep their 2017 tax cut in place and even in fact he said he would extend it beyond the current expiration date if he wins back the White House.

What a pitiful hypocritical bunch they truly are as noted in the article and to all those in the GOP side of Congress who support him and them in return for big bucks to stay in office.

I wonder how much any of that would change were Trump to win in November – which BTW: Must never ever happen.

Thanks for stopping by.


Wednesday, April 10, 2024

AZ 1864 Abortion Law: Constitutional Provision is Crazy - Other Parts are Racist & Totally Nutty

1864 Original Abortion Wording 
(AZ was not even a state in 1864)

1864 racism was totally acceptable
(Apparently could still apply today)

1864 Interracial Marriage Taboo
(Could also be applied today)

Startling and concerning abortion ruling in Arizona by the AZ Supreme Court reported on here from CBS News and most other major media outlets with this similar headline:

“Arizona Supreme Court rules abortion ban from 1864 can be enforced”

That 1864 law, passed 48 years even before AZ was admitted as the 48th official U.S. state on February 12, 1912 says in part on this subject (also cited above from that state constitution): 

A person who provides, supplies or administers to a pregnant woman, or procures such woman to take any medicine, drugs or substance, or uses or employs any instrument or other means whatever, with intent thereby to procure the miscarriage of such woman, unless it is necessary to save her life, shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for not less than two years nor more than five years.”

More from the article:

The Arizona Supreme Court ruled Tuesday (April 9, 2024) that the 160-year-old abortion ban may be enforced, clearing the way for a ban on almost all abortions in the state. 

That 1864 ban has exceptions only to save the life of the mother but none in cases of rape or incest. 

The old law supersedes Arizona's 15-week abortion ban, which was passed by the legislature and signed in 2022 by then GOP Gov. Doug Ducey.

That 2022 ban included exceptions in cases of medical emergencies and restrictions on medication abortion, and it requires an ultrasound before an abortion and parental consent for minors. 

But the 15-week ban did not repeal the 1864 law, the state Supreme Court found is “predicated entirely on the existence of a federal constitutional right to an abortion,” which was struck down with the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2022.

Arizona Supreme Court Justice John Lopez wrote in the opinion:Absent the federal constitutional abortion right, and because [the 15-week abortion ban] does not independently authorize abortion, there is no provision in federal or state law prohibiting [the 1864 abortion ban's] operation. Accordingly, [the 1864 ban] is now enforceable.”

The Arizona Supreme Court concluded that abortion policy is a matter to be decided either by the legislature or by citizens in the ballot initiative process (Note: Now an on-going process BTW).

The court said it would not “make this weighty policy decision because such judgments are reserved for our citizens.” 

Justice Lopez further wrote:We merely follow our limited constitutional role and duty to interpret the law as written.” 

The court also stayed the enforcement of the 1864 ban for 14 days, to enable the parties to return to the trial court to pursue other matters in the case. 

Beyond that stay, there's a delayed enforcement agreement in place that was signed by former Arizona AG Mark Brnovich that effectively extends the stay for another 45 days beyond the 14-day period.

Note: Trump said the state Supreme Court went too far in its ruling adding:It's all about state's rights, and that'll be straightened out. I'm sure that the governor and everybody else are going to bring it back into reason and that'll be taken care of, I think very quickly.”

This is Trump on the issue of abortion that dates back many, many years. What a two-faced flip-flopper he truly is.


DEM Gov. Katie Hobbs noted that both chambers of the Arizona Legislature are controlled by Republicans. 

DEM AG Kris Mayes issued a statement saying:The ruling is unconscionable and an affront to freedom. As long as I am Attorney General, no woman or doctor will be prosecuted under this draconian law in this state.”

My 2 Cents: As I said right up front that I am not a lawyer, but it seems strangely odd and maybe even unlawful for AZ to rely on this 1864 constitutional provision 48 years before they even became a legal part of the United States as a state. 

So, how could a territory have a Constitution still in force and used today even before they become a valid state, and before the Civil War had ended, and while the U.S. was still under President Lincoln? 

I honestly wonder what the rationale is for that. 

Thanks for stopping by.


Friday, April 5, 2024

Judge Cannon Legal Test: She Comes Across as Judicial Novice Out of Touch with Realty

Smith wins 1st part of her 2-part demand
(Now goes full bore after 2nd part)

Key players in the Classified Doc Criminal Case

UPDATED: One new and major chart added to the the original story that follows below for clarity:

Chart Added:

PRA Civil cases & Espionage Act Criminal
(Judge Cannon is 100% wrong)

Extensive critical subject topic update on the classified documents case at Mar-a-Lago as it relates to Judge Aileen Cannon’s stupid crazy delay tactics to aid Trump while also showing that she knows nothing  about the law, this case, except to keep protecting Trump and hoping he wins and saves her behind in the process with this NEWSWEEK article headline:

“Aileen Cannon's Future Looks Bleak”

It is time for Special Prosecutor Jack Smith to have Judge Aileen Cannon removed from this classified documents case.

That statement come from former 30-year Federal prosecutor, Glenn Kirschner, who wrote on X (formerly Twitter) that Smith should seek Cannon's removal from the case. 

He wrote precisely:Jack Smith literally and figuratively lays down the law. The disqualification bucket runneth over, and it's time for a motion to remove Trump-appointed Judge Aileen Cannon from presiding over a case involving a defendant to whom she owes her job.” (Note: Kirschner has been a frequent critic of Trump).

The video below and story is from MSNBC via AXIOS (here) and it outlines the case in stark terms – worth watching: 

Click here to watch that MSNBC  VIDEO


Cannon is overseeing the case in which Trump is accused of illegally retaining classified documents, hoarding them at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida and obstructing attempts by federal officials to retrieve them.

The former president has pleaded not guilty to the charges against him. He has denied any wrongdoing in the case and has claimed that the documents he retained were personal and he had right to them.

In a key court filing on Tuesday *April 9* Smith strongly criticized Cannon's proposed jury instructions in the Trump trial, which would allow a jury to decide that Trump was legally entitled to keep them under the Presidential Records Act (PRA) as personal items.

Pam Keith, Esq, CEO of the Center for Employment Justice and who attended the 2020 convention as a Biden nominee, said that Cannon has no future as a judge if Biden is re-elected. She also wrote on X that Aileen Cannon is angling for a [Supreme Court] nomination, and added: “She has a PERSONAL stake in helping Trump avoid conviction, and is doing her level best to curry his favor. She has ZERO future if Biden wins.”

Ty Cobb, former Assistant U.S. Attorney in MD and a former White House lawyer in the Trump administration, said that an appeal court will take Cannon off the case saying that Smith's court filing this week, in which he strongly objected to Cannon's proposed jury instructions, signaled that he is preparing to seek her removal. 

Then later speaking on CNN’s “OutFront” program, Cobb said that prosecutors are prepared to take an appeal to the 11th circuit in Florida if Cannon continues to rule against them, adding: They'll be in a position to take her up to the 11th Circuit. And I think the 11th circuit will likely take her off the case.”

Cobb concluded:Cannon has not been impartial in the case. Her incompetence is so gross that I think it clearly creates the perception of impartiality – of partiality, and her attempt to put her thumb on the scale. So, I think that should disqualify her. Many legal commentators have tried to be polite about Judge Cannon's missteps here and suggesting that they relate somehow to her inexperience or incompetence. I think the evidence of her bias is pretty palpable at this stage of the game.”

MORE TOPICS FROM NEWSWEEK:

1. Trump blasts S/C Jack Smith for attacking Judge Cannon

2. S/C Smith close to pressing nuclear button on Judge Cannon

3. Incompetent Judge Cannon will be taken off case

4. FBI could raid Trump Tower

5. Trump kept classified docs in Trump Tower & in NJ

My 2 Cents: This classified documents case is the most-serious of all the charges and cases pending against Trump for these several reasons: (1) What are the unaccounted documents subject matter; (2) Where are those documents now; (3) Who possibly has them; and (4) Why do they have them (the reason)?

I had a Secret clearance from 1961-1973 and that was upgraded to Secret (SCI) from 1973 right until today that I still have kept all these years since my various Marine Corps duties and then other DOD & government-related positions. Even though I’m now retired the T/S (SCI) clearance still holds after a short and simple routine update.

For me this case has great personal concern about Trump keeping and mishandling those T/S (SCI) documents before, during, and after his presidency as outlined above. I know how sensitive the information can be. 

This case should be the #1 major concern of every voter in November as well … just image he gets back in the White House with a clear record of “absolute immunity” that SCOTUS is now considering to grant to him. 

I cannot personally comprehend that happening or if it were, what would it mean for our national security and status and safety as a trustful and great nation and ally for our friends today? 

My best guess it all would be in the toilet and so would we as a free democratic nation. That must never ever happen. 

I don’t understand one bit why Judge Cannon cannot see that and schedule a trial date for Trump to show the public and the world what justice is and means, and that in America “No one is above the law,” and especially in this extremely and most-serious case. 

Thanks for stopping by.


Sunday, March 24, 2024

GOP in Control: Cuts to Social Security; Medicare; Medicaid; ACA & CHIPS Despite the Denials

Impact of GOP's plan, vision, and goals

Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, ACA, and CHIPs cuts again in the news and addressed by President Biden, and rebuttal from Trump and his mouthpiece vis-à-vis his earlier remarks re; those cuts from NEWSWEEK with this headline:

“Joe Biden Issues Social Security Warning”

President Biden once again warned of the threat that Trump would pose to Social Security if he wins back the White House saying in a post on X (formerly Twitter): “Trump was just one vote away from repealing the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Now, he's determined to try again, running to ‘terminate' it’ — and cut Medicare and Social Security while he's at it. I won't let it happen.”

When asked for comment, Trump spokesperson and routine nasty mouthpiece, Steven Cheung, told Newsweek: 

Steven Cheung who thinks and writes for Trump

Crooked Joe Biden's cognitive decline must be getting worse because President Trump has consistently said he will not touch Social Security and Medicare.”

The future of Social Security, which faces a severe financial shortfall in the coming years, has become a top issue ahead of the 2024 election, set to be a rematch of the 2020 election between Biden and Trump.

Biden’s comments come after Trump appeared to suggest in an interview earlier this month that he was he was open to making cuts to Social Security and Medicare after previously being opposed to touching the programs that millions of Americans rely on for financial and medical support.

This is what Trump said on CNBC's Squawk Box in response to a question about Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid: “There is a lot you can do in terms of entitlements, in terms of cutting, and in terms of also the theft and the bad management of entitlements.”

Then at a rally in Ohio a few days after that interview, Trump sought to walk back those earlier comments, saying: I made a promise that I will always keep Social Security, Medicare. We always will keep it. We never will cut it.” (According to the AP).

Trump then claimed Social Security would be gone if Biden wins a second term, despite the president vowing to protect and strengthen the program, saying in true Trump style, saying: Americans will not be able to have Social Security with Biden in office because he's destroying the economics of our country. And that includes Medicare, by the way, and American seniors are going to be in big trouble.”

During his State of the Union address, President Biden strongly pledged to protect Social Security and Medicare after accusing Republicans of wanting to make cuts to the programs while giving tax breaks to the wealthy.

President Biden concluded his SOS remarking saying: Many of my friends on the other side of the aisle want to put Social Security on the chopping block. If anyone here tries to cut Social Security of Medicare or raise the retirement age, I will stop you. The working people who built this country pay more into Social Security than millionaires and billionaires do. It's not fair [...] I'll protect and strengthen Social Security and make the wealthy pay their fair share.”

My 2 Cents: A bit of GOP history and hypocrisy on this subject:

* Former ousted Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA); Leader Steve Scalise (R-LA), and 130 other House Republicans voted to raise the Social Security retirement age to 70 in 2015.

* Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) said: “One thing that you probably haven't ever heard from a politician: It will be my objective to phase out Social Security. To pull it up by the roots, and get rid of it.”

* Sen. John Thune (R-SD) argued that Social Security and Medicare benefits should be cut.

* Sen. Rick Scott (R-FL) championed a plan to put Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security on the chopping block every five years, thus putting the economic security of 65 million Social Security beneficiaries at risk. 

The Republican Study Committee (RSC), which represents nearly 80% of House Republicans, released their 2024 budget proposal which called for raising the Social Security retirement age, thus forcing Americans to work longer for less.

In the same budget, they outline a total of $5 trillion in tax cuts skewed to the wealthy and corporations, cutting taxes by at least $175,000 a year for the wealthiest 0.1% of Americans.

Finally, and seen here is a state-by-state analysis from House Budget Committee Democrats shows what raising the retirement age would harm and shrink benefits for millions of people across the United States. Check out.

Thanks for stopping by.

Thursday, March 21, 2024

Judge Cannon Trump Trial: Legal Experts, Scholars, Security Experts All Say She's Off the Mark

 

Extract from the Presidential Records Act (PRA) (1978)
(Trump and Cannon both want to ignore that law)

FL Federal District Judge Cannon is openly helping delay the Mar-a-Lago classified docs trial to help Trump as long as possible and that is based on a number of opinions by legal experts and security personnel across all lines agree that Judge Cannon is way in over her head on this issue — the most-serious of all charges against Trump.

She misreads all sources on this case and she cites non-legal reasons about Trump saying he could keep anything he wanted when he left the W/H … the presidential records act (PRA) does not allow that – plus, all official docs must go to (NARA) the National Archives as public property and not as Trump’s personal property as he keeps saying that even involves highly classified documents saying they are his property – they are not.

Now, witness #5 fromMar-a-Lago (Bradley Butler) has blown the whistle (interview click here from CNN) on the movement of boxes filled with T/S SCI docs and other such materials from Mar-a-Lago to Bedminster. 

No one knew about that move just before the FBI raided Mar-a-Lago and took hundreds of T/S (SCI) documents while being told: “That’s all of them” which we now know was a lie (DOJ Certification is here). Trump’s lawyer Christina Bobb was tasked and instructed to certify to the FBI and DOJ that all sensitive government documents stored at Mar-a-Lago and subpoenaed by the Grand Jury had been returned, though she had not herself conducted the search for the records ergo: she lied.

That false certification is strong evidence at the center of the criminal investigation into obstruction of justice against Trump after he assured the FBI no more DOCS were anywhere on the property when there was.

Also, now Judge Cannon wants the jury, without any security clearances, to review the docs. Her proposal is as many legal experts have said, is an insane and illegal and blatant interference with the law.

My 2 Cents: So, I ask: (1) where are the docs; (2) who has them; (3) what do they contain; and (4) why did Trump give them away? This is by far the most-critical charge against Trump right next to the January 6 insurrection.

It is painfully clear to me that Judge Cannon has one main goal in the FL Mar-a-Lago classified documents case: Delay for any trial to save Trump, hoping he wins reelection and then he would nominate her to the U.S. Supreme Court to replace possibly either Justice Thomas or Justice Alito (just my hunch).

Either way she is stalling at every turn to delay any trial for him as I outline above.

In short as numerous expert has said, both Democrat and Republican and down the legal spectrum and all very highly experienced legal experts.

FYI: As a young Marine, I had a Secret clearance from 1961-1970 while serving in Korea with the Naval Advisory Group at ROKMC HQ and elsewhere. Since 1970 and still until today, I have had a Top Secret (SCI) clearance from my previous intelligence field work worldwide.

On this most-serious case Judge Cannon seems more like a first year law student than a Federal judge. 

I have zero respect for Judge Cannon who is way out of step in her judicial decision-making and skills on this critical topic.

Thanks for stopping by.


Wednesday, March 13, 2024

Intel Chiefs: Issue Warning to Congress of Global Threat in Fragile World Order

L-R: DIA; FBI; CIA; DNI; NSA; State Cyber Research

TIME has a story that is very concerning and worrisome at the same time with this their article headline:

“U.S. Intel Chiefs Warn of Threats to Increasingly Fragile World Order”

U.S. intelligence leaders warned on Monday (March 11) that the country faces an “increasingly fragile world order” as it navigates a range of global threats exacerbated by adversaries' use of emerging technologies like AI. 

The hearing represents an annual opportunity for lawmakers to publicly question the country’s top intelligence chiefs. In addition to DNI Haines also on the panel were: CIA Director William Burns; FBI Director Christopher Wray; Assistant Secretary of State for Intelligence and Research Brett Holmgren; NSA Director Lt. Gen. Timothy Haugh; and the head of the DIA (Defense Intelligence Agency), Lt. Gen Jeffrey Kruse, all appeared before the Senate panel.

Ms. Avril Haines, Director of National Intelligence (DNI) told the Senate Intelligence Committee at its annual hearing on the top threats to the nation that:The threat of malign actors exploiting these tools and technology to undercut U.S. interests and democracy is particularly potent as voters go to the polls in more than 60 elections around the globe this year.”

U.S. intelligence agencies are focused on China's efforts to manipulate the 2024 presidential election and the potential for bad actors to use AI tools to create and amplify disinformation campaigns.

In the overall intelligence community’s new 40-page unclassified report on worldwide threats, they wrote: “The U.S. is facing an ambitious but anxious China, a confrontational Russia, some regional powers such as Iran, and more capable non-state actors [who] are challenging longstanding rules of the international system as well as U.S. primacy within it.”

Here are some of the threats covered in the hearing:

China may target the 2024 U.S. elections: Officials assess that China “may attempt to influence the U.S. elections in 2024 at some level because of its desire to sideline critics of China and magnify US societal divisions,” according to their 40-page report.

DNI Director Haines said:Under President Xi Jinping, Chinese leaders believe it is essential to project power globally in order to be able to resist U.S. pressure. Xi's focus on boosting China’s economy may temper any election interference, which would jeopardize the relationship with the U.S. and potentially damage China’s ability to attract foreign investment.” 

TikTok under fireLawmakers from both parties raised concerns about the popular social-media app, which is mentioned briefly in the intelligence report.

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) said:China uses the TikTok data from Americans to basically read your mind and predict what videos you want to see. The problem is the algorithm that powers it is controlled by a company in China that must do whatever the Chinese Communist Party tells them to do.”

In the report, U.S. spy chiefs noted that China is “demonstrating a higher degree of sophistication in its influence activity, including experimenting with generative AI.”

TikTok accounts run by a Chinese propaganda arm reportedly targeted both Democrat and Republican candidates from during the 2022 U.S. midterm elections.

There is bipartisan agreement that TikTok, which is owned by the Chinese company, ByteDance, poses a national security threat.

A House bill that would require the company to divest from the massively popular platform, which has about 170 million U.S. users, or face a ban is expected to come to a vote in the House this week.

The bill requires ByteDance to sell TikTok within six months or be banned from Apple, Google, and other U.S. app stores and web-hosting services. The measure is sponsored by Republicans, but has significant bipartisan support.

President Joe Biden, whose campaign recently created its own TikTok account, told reporters:If they pass it, I’ll sign it.”

High risk of escalation in the Middle EastThe war in Gaza and the resulting humanitarian crisis has galvanized Arab countries in the region, where there is rising “public sentiment against Israel and the United States for the death and destruction,” the intelligence officials say in their report.

DNI Haines also told lawmakers at the hearing, which was repeatedly interrupted by anti-war protestors inspired by Hamas:That terrorist groups including al-Qaeda and ISIS have directed supporters to conduct attacks against Israeli and American interests as the war drags on. While it is too early to tell, it is likely that the Gaza conflict will have a generational impact on terrorism.”

Read More Here: Inside the Israel-Hamas Information War.

The Intelligence report also states that the U.S. intelligence community assesses that:Iranian leaders did not orchestrate nor had foreknowledge of Hamas’ October 7 assault on Israel, attacks by Iranian-backed groups are threatening to destabilize Lebanon, Iraq, the Gulf, and the Red Sea. The risk of escalation into direct interstate conflict, intended or otherwise, remains high.”

U.S. support for Ukraine remains criticalAs the war in Ukraine enters its third year, U.S. intelligence chiefs emphasized the importance of continued U.S. military support.

CIA Director Burns told the panel:The Ukrainians are not running out of courage and tenacity, they're running out of ammunition. And we're running out of time to help them,” then he added: If the U.S. is seen as walking away from support for Ukraine, not only is that going to feed doubts amongst our allies and partners in the Indo-Pacific, it's going to stoke the ambition of Chinese leadership.”

Intelligence leaders noted the challenge posed by Russia's strengthening ties with China, Iran, and North Korea, which they said was bolstering its defense production and economy.

DNI Haines also told the panel:Putin's strategic goals remain unchanged. He continues to see NATO enlargement and Western support for Ukraine as reinforcing his long-held belief that the United States and Europe seek to restrict Russian power and undermine him.”

More on this story at the link provided above and here.

Directly related to TikTok is this GOP House Energy and Commerce Committee hearing on banning TikTok seen here.

My 2 Cents: We must stay alert, vigilant, and smart to see and detect, avoid, and report any nonsense in the upcoming 2024 election cycle ... which may end up worse than 2020, and more so if Trump loses again which I honestly think he will and by much larger margin than his loss to Joe Biden in 2020. 

The above Intel agency’s report is alarming and noteworthy and especially as it relates to China, Russia, and Iran activities and their massive disinformation campaigns which are ongoing right now. 

Our right to vote in a free, fair, safe, and secure election is the number one priority of our country that keeps us who we are: free and democratic – nothing nor no one can be seen to hamper that right. 

Thanks for stopping by.


Saturday, March 9, 2024

Sen. Katie Britt post SOTU: What a Shameful Display of Arrogance, Deceit, and Downright Lying

First of all, listen to the difference between Alabama Senator Katie Britt’s natural voice and her speech voice in this short video clip - was she auditioning for movie role?

Senator, Actress Wannabe, Liar, or Maybe All Three

Now below is Sen. Katie Britt (R-AL) and her whopper story post-SOTU address on National TV from here with this headline question:

“Was Trump supporter Katie Britt caught in whopping lie about graphic sex trafficking story?”

Related article here from NEWSWEEK.

Sen. Katie Britt (R-AL) told a graphic sex-trafficking story about a woman who was sexually abused “over and over” by members of Mexican drug cartels on the United States side of the Rio Grande. Britt implied also that the woman had confided the story to her and that the events had occurred during President Biden’s administration. 

But reporter Jonathan Katz, in a lengthy video posted to social media, connects the dots on the story, and Britt lied. 

FACT: The woman told her story many times publicly, including to Congress; the events didn’t occur in the United States; and they didn’t happen under President Biden; it happened during George W. Bush’s presidency (2004-2008).

Britt precisely said:When I first took office, I did something different. I traveled to the Del Rio sector of Texas, where I spoke to a woman who shared her story with me. She had been sex trafficked by the cartels starting at age 12. She told me not just that she was raped every day, but how many times a day she was raped. The cartels put her on a mattress in a shoebox of a room, and they sent men through that door, over and over again, for hours and hour’s on-end. We wouldn’t be OK with this happening in a third-world country. This is the United States of America, and its past time we start acting like it. President Biden’s border crisis is a disgrace. It’s despicable. And it’s almost entirely preventable.”

AL senators it seems are famous liars – first Tuberville and now Britt.

My 2 Cents: Sen. Britt if she had any dignity at all and it seems she does not, then she should resign from the Senate … seems she might be a George Santos wannabe or maybe already is.

The story above stands as proof.

Thanks for stopping by.

Sunday, March 3, 2024

AI Not Totally Trustworthy: 100% Wide Range Oversight Needed in This 2024 Election Cycle

Devious Hands Are Already in Play A Proven Fact

Two thought-providing articles that mankind had better pay attention to the massive and sudden growth of AI … check out this first article from BUSINESS INSIDER on the subject with this headline:

“An AI weapons race may create a world where everyone stays inside out of fear of being ‘chased down by swarms of slaughterbots’ warns the founding Skype engineer.”

We could be reaching an “Oppenheimer moment” that is in other words: Researchers are questioning their responsibility for developing technology that might have unintended consequences just like the first A-bomb had.

Tesla’s Elon Musk; Apple’s co-founder Steve Wozniak; Stability AI CEO Emad Mostaque; researchers at Alphabet's AI lab DeepMind; and notable AI professors signed an open letter issued by the “Future of Life Institute” calling for a six-month pause on advanced AI development saying part:Advanced AI could represent a profound change in the history of life on Earth, and should be planned for and managed with commensurate care and resources. Unfortunately, this level of planning and management is not happening, even though recent months have seen AI labs locked in an out-of-control race to develop and deploy ever more powerful digital minds that no one — not even their creators — can understand, predict, or reliably control.”

The second article on the same subject focuses on election tampering is here from Campaign Legal Center (CLC) with this headline:

“How Artificial Intelligence Influences Elections, and What We Can Do About It:

AI technologies could easily be used to manufacture fake images and false evidence of misconduct, such as ballot tampering or shredding.

That would not only erode public trust in the results of elections, it could fuel additional public threats of violence against election administrators.

The year 2024 will be the first election year to feature the widespread influence of AI before, during, and after voters cast their ballots, including in the making and distribution of public messages about candidates as well as electoral processes. CLC has been working hard to help address the impact of AI on our democracy.

That includes educating the public about what to expect in upcoming political campaigns and recommending policy solutions lawmakers should adopt to mitigate the greatest risks to our election system.  

CLC has particularly highlighted the danger of political ads that use AI technology to generate deceptively realistic false content — such as “DEEPFAKES”: Which are manipulated media that depict people doing or saying things they didn’t say or do, or events that didn’t really occur — to mislead the public about what candidates are asserting, their positions on issues, and even whether certain events actually happened.

If left unchecked, these fraudulent and deceptive uses of AI could infringe on voters’ fundamental right to make informed decisions. 

In addition to influencing the voters’ perceptions of candidates, AI could be used to manipulate the administration of elections, including by spreading disinformation to suppress voter turnout.

Bad actors could use AI tools to create and distribute convincingly false messages about where or when to cast a ballot, or to discourage voters from showing up to their polling locations in the first place.  

For example, shortly before the 2024 NH primary election, an AI-generated robocall simulated President Biden’s voice and urged voters not to participate in that election, falsely suggesting that voters should “save” their vote for the 2024 general election in November.

The average voter hearing this message might reasonably have concluded that Biden had actually recorded the message, and that they should comply with his request — effectively disenfranchising them.  

Looking ahead, it is not hard to imagine other fabricated messages from trusted voices being used to dissuade citizens from voting, undermine their ability to vote or to raise false alarms about emergency situations like a fire or an attack that would persuade voters to stay at home on Election Day.  

Moreover, there is a real risk that AI could be used to worsen the disproportionate targeting of disinformation at Black and brown voters who already face too many barriers to equal participation in the democratic process. 

AI also creates new opportunities for bad actors to undermine election administration or sow unjustified doubt about election results. 

AI technologies could easily be used to manufacture fake images and false evidence of misconduct, such as ballot tampering or shredding. That would not only erode public trust in the results of elections, it could fuel additional public threats of violence against election administrators.

In recent years, nonpartisan election workers have already faced unprecedented levels of threats and harassment while trying to ensure our democratic process is smooth and fair. AI technology could make their situation even worse. 

Even after all the ballots have been cast, AI could be used to fabricate audio of a candidate claiming they rigged the results, or to generate other misinformation that could persuade the supporters of a failed campaign to disrupt vote counting and certification procedures, which are already increasingly politicized and served as the basis for the effort to sabotage the 2020 presidential election (and we all recall who from).

Fake media made with AI have already been used to influence major elections in Argentina and Slovakia. To be clear, the risks of election manipulation, voter suppression, and misinformation all predate the arrival of AI-based media tools.

AI undoubtedly provides bad actors with easy access to new tools to harm our democracy more easily and effectively, increasing the urgency of a robust response.

Many necessary solutions also go beyond regulating new technologies, and laws often lag behind even well-established tech. 

States have taken action; or passed a bill, drafted legislation, even citizen groups proposing bills ranging from mandatory disclaimers that would inform voters when AI is being used in elections, to legislation banning political DEEPFAKES.

At the federal level, bipartisan legislation has been introduced in Congress that would prohibit the distribution of deceptive AI-generated content to influence an election or to fund raise.  

Federal agencies are also considering what they can do to safeguard our democracy in the age of AI, with some proposals that would extend beyond elections but nevertheless help address the specific risks voters face.

For example, in response to the AI-generated fake Biden robocall in NH Hampshire (cited above), the FCC outlawed certain robocalls containing voices generated by AI.  

Finally, new education efforts are underway to simply prepare the public for AI-generated media being used to influence and possibly manipulate elections, which will hopefully help mitigate its worst effects.

Twenty major tech companies, including Google; Meta (the parent company of Facebook and Instagram); OpenAI; X (formerly Twitter); and TikTok have all recently pledged to take concrete steps to detect, track, and combat the use of DEEPFAKES and other election interference efforts. 

Of course, they must follow through on those promises.  

Although it is encouraging to see widespread interest in preventing AI-based election manipulation, many proposed solutions are still a long way from providing tangible protection for voters and the electoral process.

This is why the CLC continues to urge policymakers across the country to redouble their efforts and take strong action to address the unique challenges AI creates for our democracy in this by far and most-critical election year in our national political history.

My 2 Cents: All I can say we all had better be alert this election cycle

Otherwise we may hear this phrase from that famous movie line by Arnold Schwarzenegger who said: “I’ll be bach…” (A little humor). 

Just kidding, but not very much – this whole AI topic is real and fast moving and very critical. We must not allow it to get out of hand. Rules and safeguards can and must be in place to protect our right to vote free, fair, safe, and secure and then in other aspects of human survival.

This is not hyperbole, just realistic concern keeping in mind the first word in AI is “Artificial” and artificial means “not real,” and yet possibly harmful or dangerous nevertheless.

So, why don’t the AI controllers just speak the truth and say: “That news report this is not real news; that image is not a real person; that is now so and so speaking; the election results you see are not real; your vote was not counted – your mail-in ballots came into late, etc., etc., etc.)? I guess the truth hurts?

Well, I say that truth is countermanded by the most-important word of all in politics and that word is “power” – Power’s goal is just that simple and it is built on: Name, Fame, and Fortune.

Thanks for stopping by.